Showing posts with label Norway. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Norway. Show all posts

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Chutzpah: Israel Bans Dr Gilbert From Gaza For Life

The Humanitarian Physician Is Denied Entry into Gaza For 'Security Reasons' 


Norway edition, reports that Israel cited security reasons for banning Dr. Gilbert from the Hamas-run enclave.
Gilbert, a leading Norwegian physician, worked as a doctor at Shifa Medical Center during the recent Israeli vicious assault on Gaza.  He also worked there during the previous round of Israel-Gaza fighting, in 2008-2009.
According to the report, Dr. Gilbert was stopped en route to the Gaza, where he was planning to return to the hospital, by Israeli officials in October 2014. 
Norway's secretary of state, Bard Glad Pedersen, told Verdens Gang newspaper: 
“From the Norwegian perspective, we have raised Gilbert's exclusion from Gaza and asked Israel to change their decision. The humanitarian situation in Gaza is still difficult and there is a need for all health workers.”
During the recent war, Dr. Gilbert accused Israel of committing "state terrorism at a very sophisticated and very high level,” and said its army was "using a wide variety of sophisticated modern weapons against a basically naked civilian population.” 
Gilbert himself believes the decision is connected to his critical comments against the state of Israel.

Monday, January 06, 2014

The Gállok Rebellion. The Sámi People vs. Grendel



The Cast: The Sámi people are the indigenous people (Finno-Ugric) who live in the Arctic area of Sápmi in Scandinavia. Perhaps you've seen them in film documentaries about their semi-nomadic life, herding reindeer. The police who are defending colonization, mineral extraction and the corporations. The reindeer, trees, plants, flowers, insects. wind, water and soil are also supporting characters in this true life drama.

The Plot: A big corporation (i.e. a group of men) who call themselves "Beowullf" is bent on extracting iron ore from pristine wilderness, destroying everything in their path with "eyes on the prize." Beowulf's extraction of the iron ore means profit in the transnational corporate pocket, money for the government officials who write laws and policies, and salaries for the police who act in robotic fashion for the corporation against the people. The extraction of the ore means money in the pockets of a few - and the destruction of migratory reindeer, other sentient beings, the sacred trees, plants, flowers, water, wind, rain, soil and the Sámi who co-habit in a symbiotic relationship with the others. The enlightened Sámi eschew violence but defend themselves and their brethren flora and fauna by other means. The police use every method available, including violence to defeat the Sámi and open the road (literally) for the corporation to rape the land.

For Us To Learn: In this drama, the Sámi are the real heroes in Sweden and they are unrelenting. When all they've built to defend the land is destroyed, they simply, steadfastly build their bulwarks again to stop "Beowulf." As with the indigenous around the world, we have so much to learn from them. The police are the tragic figures in this story, working hard to pave the way for a foreign corporation to rob a natural resource and to destroy the people and their natural home.


Beowulf and Grendel: It may be that the men who named their corporation "Beowulf" have never read nor ever really grasped the message of this oldest known piece of Anglo-Saxon literature. If they wanted to borrow from the 7th century epic poem they would have more accurately called themselves, "Grendel." The Sámi people are a reincarnation of Beowulf, the hero of the Geats who came to the aid of Hroðgar, king of the Danes, to kill the destroyer-monster Grendel with his bare hands and later Grendel's mother with a sword found in her lair.  Grendel lives today in the form of the capitalist system and the corporations and persons who serve it. Likewise, the Beowulf-Sámi are exemplary, attacking Grendel with their bare hands - the indigenous leading the way and we must follow in their path if we want to save the earth and ourselves.  It's been my practice to read Beowulf annually for the past 40 years and a poem emerged from one of those readings ten years ago.

Grendel

Grendel haunts the cellar way
pausing on a lower stair
adumbrations thick and damp
rumbling from his ancient lair

“There a secret humid harbor,
dripping, lingering decay”,
senses with his eyelids low
but for hunger, he would stay.

High above the sunken moors
riders leave their shield and hoof
led by a gaze set like a vice
on the jaws of Beowulf.

- By Les Blough
February 2003

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Norway



By Morten Berg
SoundTrack by Tore Johnson

In this timelapse film you will see some of Norway´s most famous nature attractions- from the beautiful fjords, spectacular views from famous panoramic viewpoints like Dalsnibba in Geiranger all the way up to Galdhøpiggen (highest mountain peak in Norway and Northern Europe) just to mention a few of the locations in this film.

Nature attractions and Locations
0:10-0:29 Hjørundfjorden/Sunnmørsalps,Øye
0:30-0:37 Slogen1564m/5131ft/Sunnmørsalps,Øye
0:37-0:45 Olden in Stryn
0:45-0:53 Briksdalsbreen in Stryn
0:53-1:00 Stegastein 650m/2132ft /Aurland
1:00-1:10 Geiranger
1:11-1:15 Skageflå/Geiranger (abandoned farm)
1:15-1:30 Ørnesvingen/Geiranger
1:30-1:46 Dalsnibba1476m/4842ft /Geiranger
1:46-2:38 Trollveggen (Troll wall/Trollwand) 1797m/5895ft
2:38-2:50 Åndalsnes
2:51-3:03 Rondane
3:04-3:12 Gudvangen/Nærøyfjorden
3:12-3:17 Hurrungane/Jotunheimen
3:17-3:27 Valdresflye1389m/4557ft /Jotunheimen(mountainpass)
3:27-3:36 Spiterstulen/Jotunheimen
3:43-4:18 Hurrungane/Jotunheimen
4:18-4:28 Turtagrø/Jotunheimen
4:29-4:34 Soleibotentind 2083m/6833ft/Jotunheimen
4:35-4:49 Fanaråken 2069m/6788ft/Jotunheimen
4:50-4:54 Sognefjellet1434m/4704ft /Jotunheimen (Mountainpass)
4:55-5:09 Spiterstulen/Jotunheimen
5:10-6:08 Galdhøpiggen 2469m/8100ft /Jotunheimen (highest mountain peak in Northern Europe)

This is my debut timelapse video, and the making of this film has been a real challenge. Living in Oslo (250-500 km away from the scenery portrayed in this film), I had to make 11 trips over a period of 15 months to fullfill this project. I had to visit and revisit locations which were not easily reached considering the the heavy photo gear I was carrying.

When I look back on this project, the most exhausting and dramatic challenge was to climb Galdhøpiggen 2469m/8100ft (5:10-6:08). I had to visit this mountain twice while I was shooting this movie, as my first attempt back in july 2010 was ruined by strong winds. In 2011, a second attempt was made, and this time I got lucky. As I witnessed a beautiful sunset on the roof of Norway and Northern Europe, I knew I was pushing the boundaries and it would be a race against darkness and dropping temperatures to the valley 1400 meters/4600 ft below. My concern was right. At this alltitude, the temperature drops rapidly when the sun sets, and the snow fields in the rather steep terrain just below the summit (which were safe during the daylight) had now turned into treacherous ice. Although I was aware that the temperature had plummeted, I didn´t know that the snow fields had turned into ice so rapidly. As a result of my carelessness and stupidity, I fell uncontrolled down the steep slope and got some deep cuts in my left hand. After all, I had lucky escape- as I stopped before I was severly hit by the rocks in the end of the slope.

As the darkness fell, I ran into another problem. Even with a powerful headlamp, I couldn't find the cairns which would lead me down to the valley. After a while I was way out of track and heading straight into steep terrain, so I had no other option than to abort the descent and spend the night in this high alpine area. Nedless to say, the night was very cold, and I had to endure frostbite for many hours. Finally, after 17 hours in this high alpine area, I returned to safety.

If you liked this video- you may check the videos below:

"Dynamic Nature":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hH4Ivi... my latest video.

"Norway -travel guide" https://vimeo.com/32381957 a slightly different version of "Norway"where I have added the locations and nature attractions in the right corner- so if there is a special part of the video you like- you can easily look it up.

Hope you enjoy it- share if you like.
Morten Berg
________________________________________­_______

Follow me for updates and still /behind the scenes images:


Monday, March 04, 2013



Artist: Quick Crew

Quick is Norwegian dance crew based in Oslo. Quick was formed in 2006 by twin brothers Suleman and Bilal Malik and their childhood friend Nasir Sirikhan.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Norwegian Electroshock Football




The shockingly hilarious fun starts @ 1:03
For English Subtitles - Press The CC-Button @ The Bottom Right.

Monday, September 24, 2012

Norway's Sane Killer

A Norwegian court ruled that Anders Behring Breivik, who mowed down 77 people in a bombing and shooting rampage in Oslo in July 2011, was sane.

The court's decision at a time when heightened anxiety over the presence of Muslims in Europe and the United States has ignited a string of attacks on the faith community. The extreme right-wing ideology from which Breivik emerged has fueled McCarthy-esque witch hunts, mosque burnings and vandalism, and temple shootings. While wildly out of touch with responsible human discourse and seemingly pathological, this climate of hate is hardly the stuff of lunatics. It is a dangerous political reality with destructive consequences.

Statistics show that nearly two decades after the Oklahoma City bombing, right-wing extremism -- not Muslim-led terrorism -- is a growing threat.

According to the Center for American Progress, which consolidated data from multiple sources, since 1995 extremists on the far right have perpetrated 56 percent of domestic terrorism attacks in the United States. That's compared with 12 percent carried out by radical Muslims. The likes of Breivik, Timothy McVeigh and Wade Michael Page have been responsible for the majority of terrorist incidents in 13 of the 17 years since the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building crumbled. In that same period, the Southern Poverty Law Center has tracked a startling 26 percent increase in the number of American hate groups. It is their rhetoric that frightens anxious citizens about the alleged menace of minority groups and can push those fears to oft-deadly conclusions.
The Islamophobia that led Breivik to his ruinous binge, for example, came from his digestion of the writings of several anti-Muslim activists, including bloggers Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, who head the group Stop the Islamization of America. Breivik mentioned them in his 1,500-page manifesto, posted online. The pair has agitated some of the country's nastiest displays of prejudice. Their bus advertisements equating the Palestinian cause with jihad created a stir in New York and San Francisco, and they fanned the flames of the uproar over the Park51 Islamic Community Center in 2010. 
Damningly, they see their mission as Breivik saw his: They call themselves "freedom fighters" on a valorous journey to save the world from Muslims. But when it was publicized that the Norway killer mentioned Spencer and Geller in his writings, they cried foul. "Clearly this individual is insane," Spencer wrote on his blog. After Breivik's initial psychological evaluation Geller expressed relief, writing, that Breivik was "declared certifiably insane, which was evident by his actions and his ten-years-in-the-making manifesto."

The magnitude of Breivik's butchery was apparently sufficient evidence of his psychosis. No normal person, in Geller and Spencer's view, would ever do such a thing. But only if that person is not a Muslim. When Muslims engage in violence, they are represented by Islamophobes as ordinary believers acting in a way that aligns with tenets of their faith, not fringe lunatics whose delusional religious interpretations lead them to a monstrous end.

Spencer and Geller never rejected his anti-Muslim ideas. And that is a problem.

The Norwegian court's verdict, underscores the need for society to address those who promote hatred and jabber about the evils of multiculturalism and the looming clash of civilizations. It proves that amplified racism, which carves society into fragments and pits them against one another, has real consequences and reaches the minds of rational thinkers who absorb such narratives and take them to their logical conclusions.

Trying to wish away intolerance and bigotry may be convenient but it is costly. During Breivik's trial, a right-wing extremist testified that he knew of nearly 100 other people who share the killer's views and supported his massacre.

Chillingly, this month Czech police raided the apartment of and arrested one such apparent supporter. They discovered a bomb, automatic weapons, police uniforms, a detonator and 400 rounds of ammunition.

The discourse of hate must be stopped before it affects other extremists quietly waiting for an opportunity to be lauded as heroes.

Via: "The Arizona Daily Sun"

Friday, September 16, 2011

Racism On The Rise In Europe


Heinz-Christian Strache, the head of the Freedom Party of Austria, ran a highly xenophobic campaign in 2008, describing women in Islamic dress as "female ninjas" [EPA]


In Norway, England, The Netherlands, Russia, and Especially Austria, Racist and Islamophobic Movements Are On The Rise.

By Billy Briggs
Last Modified: 02 Sep 2011 18:24
Courtesy Of "Al-Jazeera"


In the wake of the atrocities in Norway perpetrated by Anders Behring Breivik, it is still unclear whether he was part of a wider conspiracy, but alarm bells are now ringing across Europe about the threat from far-right extremist groups. With no end in sight to the economic crisis afflicting many nations, the growing fear is that voters are increasingly attracted to far-right parties, many of whom have been building support by opposing immigration and stirring up hatred of Muslims.

In Norway, the right-wing Progress party garnered 23 per cent of the vote in the last election, making it the second-largest. And a recent poll found that half of all Norwegians favour restricting immigration. This did not go far enough for Breivik, who believed that the forced deportation of Muslims should be government policy, a radical political view he formed over time by participating in extreme online forums where he discussed his beliefs with like-minded individuals across the world.

The 32-year-old Norwegian made his thoughts clear in a 1,500 page document he wrote before embarking on his killing spree. Shortly before he detonated his bomb in Oslo and then killed 68 people on Utoeya, Breivik emailed his document to 1,003 of his far-right contacts, including extremists in England whom Breivik boasted to have forged links with in recent years in his opposition to Islam.

He particularly admired the English Defence League for its anti-Islam stance, and - according to the respected anti-fascist magazine, Searchlight - posted a message on its website in March this year. Using the pseudonym Sigurd Jorsalfare after a Norwegian king who led a Crusade in the 12th century, Breivik wrote: "Hello. To you all good English men and women, just wanted to say that you're a blessing to all in Europe, in these dark times all of Europe are looking to you in such [sic] of inspiration, courage and even hope that we might turn this evil trend with islamisation all across our continent."

United Kingdom

Searchlight said that Breivik had been in contact with both the EDL and its Norwegian counterpart, the Norwegian Defence League (NDL), a claim denied by the EDL whose leadership condemned Breivik's crimes.

The EDL has always insisted it is a peaceful protest group which opposes militant Islam, but since its inception in 2009, violence has erupted at many EDL demonstrations in Britain.

Stephen Lennon, who was convicted last week (Monday) of leading a street brawl involving 100 soccer fans in the English city of Luton in August 2010, is one of the founders of the EDL and during an interview with Al Jazeera in 2009, he explained why the group formed in Luton, the city where he lives: "For more than a decade now,

there's been tension in Luton between Muslim youths and whites. We all get on fine - black, white, Indian, Chinese - everyone does, in fact, apart from some Muslim youths who've become extremely radicalised since the first Gulf War. Preachers of hate such as Anjem Choudary have been recruiting for radical Islamist groups in Luton for years. Our government does nothing, so we decided we'd start protesting against radical Islam, and it grew from there," he said.

While the EDL has been largely unsuccessful in gaining public support - mainly due to the fact that its core consists of football hooligans - there is concern that the group could be inspiring other unstable individuals who oppose Islam. The EDL has been pro-active in building links across the world and claims to have support from - aside from people in Norway - Holland, France, Sweden, USA and Israel, among others.

The Netherlands

Indeed, the EDL embraced the Dutch far-right politician Geert Wilders, whom Breivik also cited in his writings.

Wilders is virulently anti-Islam and leads the Party for Freedom, Holland's third-largest party. He is a controversial figure who antagonised the Muslim world by calling for a ban on the Quran, which he likened to Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf. Despite this, Wilders was voted politician of the year in 2007 by the Dutch press, and his Freedom Party went from winning nine seats in the 2006 election to 24 in 2010, taking a larger share of the vote than the Christian Democrats.

Austria

Austria has a Freedom Party (FPO) too, with a similar political outlook. The party is led by Heinz-Christian Strache, who has been successful in drumming up support by opposing Islam and immigration.

In 2008, the FPO and Alliance for the Future (BZO) jointly secured almost one-third of the electorate's vote during the 2008 election. Campaigning against the "Islamisation" of Austria, the two parties secured 29 per cent in a result viewed as a horrifying development by many people across Europe. Both parties ran highly xenophobic campaigns, particularly the FPO, which pledged to set up a ministry to deport foreigners and whose leader, Heinz-Christian Strache, mocked homosexuals and described women in Islamic dress as "female ninjas". The FPO also wishes to revoke the Verbotsgesetz, an Austrian law enacted in 1947 that bans the promotion of neo-Nazi ideology.

Strache has been at the centre of controversy, and pictures surfaced in 2008 showing the FPO leader wearing army fatigues and clutching what appeared to be a gun in a forest. The images were allegedly taken at a neo-Nazi training camp in his youth, but Strache denied this and said they were from a day out paint-balling. He was also photographed apparently giving a three-fingered neo-Nazi salute in a bar, though he said he was only ordering three beers.

The FPO has tried to distance itself from extremism, but the party was founded by two former SS officers, Anton Reinthaller and Herbert Schweiger. In 2008, I interviewed Schweiger - who died this past July - at his home in Austria a few weeks before he was due to appear in court on charges, for the fifth time, of promoting neo-Nazi ideology.

Described to me as the "Puppet Master" of Austria and Germany's far right, Schweiger, 85, was remarkably sharp-minded and remained proud of his Nazi views. He was a lieutenant in the Waffen SS Panzer Division Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler, an elite unit formed in the 1930s to act as the Führer's personal bodyguards. After escaping a POW camp during WWII, Schweiger returned to his homeland, Austria, where he lived openly from 1947 and became heavily involved in politics.

He was a founding member of three political parties in Austria - the VDU, the FPO, and the banned NDP. During our interview he also admitted to involvement in terrorism and training a far-right cell comprising of  Burschenschaften (right-wing brotherhoods founded in universities) who were fighting for the reunification of Austria and South Tyrol, now part of Italy, in 1961.

"I was an explosives expert in the SS so I trained the Burschenschaften how to make bombs. We used the hotel my wife and I owned as a training camp," he said. Thirty people in Italy were murdered during a bombing campaign. One man convicted for the atrocities, Norbert Burger, later formed the now-banned neo-Nazi NDP party with Schweiger. Schweiger's involvement earned him his first spell in custody in 1962, but he was acquitted.

Schweiger gave support to the FPO, saying that Strache was correct with his strategy in opposing Islam and immigration. Schweiger said that despite his age, he still travelled widely both in Austria and Germany to teach "the fundamentals of Nazism" to underground cells of neo-Nazis whom, he claimed, had infiltrated mainstream political parties such as the FPO.

The FPO disputed this, but according to Vienna's Documentation Centre of Austrian Resistance (DOW) - which monitors neo-Nazi activity - the party has strong links to neo-Nazis through the Burschenschaften, many of whom are members of Strache's party.

The Burschenschaften were banned by the Allies after WWII, but reformed in the 1950s. In 1987, Olympia, one of the most extreme fraternities, nominated Rudolf Hess for the Nobel Peace Prize. Senior members of the FPO are Burschenschaften, including Strache and Martin Graf, who was elected deputy president of the Austrian Parliament after the election, despite vociferous opposition from concentration camp survivors. The FPO's Andreas Molzer is also Burschenschaften and has met with the British National Party in London. Graf, Strache and Molzer all strongly denied having links to extremists and the FPO said that it only wishes to revoke the Verbotsgesetz because it believes in upholding freedom of expression.

Wolfgang Purtscheller, a revered author and journalist who has spent his career exposing Austria's far right at great risk to his life, said that neo-Nazis have learned by the mistakes of their past, and are now working to build public support within the mainstream parties:

"You had people like Schweiger - the puppet master in the mountains for half a century - able to form political parties while teaching people to make bombs, and the Burschenshaften with its history of terrorism and links to the mainstream parties. These are the intellectuals who hold the positions of power in Austrian society, in the police, the judiciary and in parliament. The neo-Nazis have learned by the mistakes of their past and are now working to build public support within the mainstream parties. Imagine what could happen if the FPO gets rid of the Verbotsgesetz."

The FPO continues to do well, and last October the party's vote surged when it took 27 per cent of the vote in Vienna's provincial election. Later that month, the FPO hosted a two-day conference attended by far-right factions from across Europe, including representatives of the Sweden Democrats, Italy's Lega Nord and the Danish People's Party. Strache has succeeded in making the FPO "respectable", and last week he sacked a party official who responded to the Norwegian murders by declaring that the real danger was Islam, not Breivik.


Russia

Russia is another nation experiencing an upsurge in racism and anti-Islamic sentiments. A number of neo-Nazi groups have sprung up in recent years, the most extreme of which have attacked and killed foreigners and immigrants from Chechnya, Tajikstan, and Caucasian nations that were once part of the USSR.

This past July, Amnesty International reported that racially-motivated violence remained a serious problem in Russia. The AI report said that, according to data from the SOVA Centre for Information and Analysis, 37 people died as a result of hate crimes during 2010. The authors wrote:

"In April, Moscow judge Eduard Chuvashov was killed, reportedly by members of a far-right group, after he had sentenced several perpetrators of hate crimes to long-term imprisonment. In October, 22-year-old Vasilii Krivets was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of 15 people of non-Slavic appearance. The extent of the problem was brought into sharp focus shortly before the AI report was published when five members of one of Russia's most vicious neo-Nazi gangs were jailed for committing 27 murders. They belonged to the Nationalist Socialist Society North and were handed life sentences at Moscow City Court. The string of killings included the videotaped decapitation of one of their own gang members."

During the trial, the court heard how the gang targeted dark-skinned victims. They were also convicted of decapitating one of their own whom they suspected of being a police informant and stealing money from the gang's funds. The decapitation, during which they donned clown masks and sang a patriotic song, was videotaped and posted online. Following the case, a group of nationalists announced a coalition with Russia's third-largest political party, the Liberal Democrat Party, which is committed to protecting Russian people and their interests.

Breivik, who murdered 76 people, said he was committed to protecting Europe from Islam. He claimed that two cells from a network he was involved with were still active. It remains to be seen if the 32-year-old was a lone wolf, but it would appear that the far right is on the march.

Billy Briggs is a freelance journalist. His work has appeared in the New Statesman, The Guardian, the Sunday Times and other publications around the world.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

The Norway Massacre

In this edition of the show we will travel to Norway to document the horror of that atrocious act and ask why it happened.

Anders Breiviks, a right wing Christian fundamentalist who allegedly had links with the right wing and islamophobic English Defence League was disaffected with his countries multicultural policy.

The Norwegian Prime Minister has said that the country will react to this disaster with more liberty and democracy.

Wednesday, September 07, 2011

Carnage In Norway - Refreshing The Narrative

A woman touches a Norwegian flag as people gather around thousands of flowers and tributes laid outside the Oslo Cathedral in Oslo, in memory of the victims of July 22 bomb attack and shooting rampage, Monday, Aug. 1, 2011

By Jeff Gates
Courtesy Of "The World News Network"

"So let us fight together with Israel, with our Zionist brothers against all anti-Zionists..."

-- Manifesto of Anders Behring Breivik

War-making storylines tend to lose their steam. Sustained warfare requires more than just a plausible Evil Doer. A credible narrative is also essential. To remind us who to hate, who better than a murderous Nordic Muslim-hater?

Far-fetched? How many Americans had heard of the Taliban before March 2001 when destruction of the ancient Buddhas at Bamiyan was reported worldwide as a 'Cultural Holocaust'? Voila! An Evil Doer brand emerged and was soon repackaged as Islamo-fascism.

Six months later, an attack on U.S. soil left little doubt that outraged Americans would be provoked to war. Combine an emotionally wrenching mass murder with manipulated intelligence and an invasion was assured-of Iraq. That miscue required sophisticated pre-staging.

Residents of Washington, DC well recall the sniper attacks that left ten dead during the October 2002 lead-up to a Senate vote on a war resolution sponsored by Jewish Zionist Senator Joe Lieberman. Those well-timed murders ensured a heightened sense of insecurity and helped ratchet up the requisite hatred-to invade a nation that played no role in 911.

Remember the Times Square Terrorist? A car belonging to a Muslim was found with two WalMart propane tanks, an alarm clock, a box of fireworks and some fertilizer. When? In May 2010 during the lead-up to a UN vote on a nuclear-free Middle East-opposed by Israel.

To sustain hate requires a sustained stream of plausible reasons to hate. Plus careful maintenance of a 'generally accepted truth' that keeps attention focused on a credible threat.

Preparing the Minds

Islamo-phobia was a fresh threat when it first appeared in a 1993 article in Foreign Affairs. Yet it dates from 1990 when Princeton Islamic scholar Bernard Lewis, an avid Zionist, touted "The Roots of Muslim Rage." By 1996, Harvard Professor Samuel Huntington was ready to publish The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.

With more than 100 nongovernmental organizations promoting The Clash, Americans experienced a seamless segue from an old narrative to a new. Without missing a beat in Pentagon spending, we ended a global Cold War and, by consensus, began a global War on Terrorism.

Huntington argued that cultural and religious identities would emerge as the primary source of conflict. To gain traction, The Clash consensus required a series of events that could be plausibly blamed on Muslim Evil Doers. That was 15 years ago-a long time to sustain a storyline.

With Osama bin Laden dead and war-weary Americans nearing the tenth anniversary of 911, The narrative was losing its punch. Plus the storytellers face a transparency problem: Intelligence agencies worldwide have identified pro-Israelis as the common source of the manipulated intelligence that induced the invasion of Iraq.

What's a Zionist to do? Answer: look to past successes.

Timing is Everything

Ten days prior to 911, Tel Aviv announced a $1 million grant to Israeli super-spy Jonathan Pollard. Why then? The timing suggests Tel Aviv was signaling its operatives and sayanim (Hebrew for volunteers).

The Norwegian shooter is akin to the narrative-advancing snipers who emerged in the lead-up to the Senate vote authorizing the U.S. military to invade Iraq. In the lead-up to next month's UN vote on statehood for Palestine, the carnage in Norway freshened up a stale storyline.

This latest mass murder was committed on the 65th anniversary of the bombing of the King David Hotel in Tel Aviv. That mass murder was an operation of the Irgun, Zionist-terrorist predecessors to the Likud Party of today's Benjamin Netanyahu.

The same night that Israel launched its Six-Day War in June 1967, Irgun operative Mathilde Krim was continuing her torrid affair with President Lyndon Johnson-in the White House. Why then? Because that land grab ensured the roots of the Muslim rage required to shape future events.

Why would a Norwegian Zionist target Norwegians? For the same reason that Irgun Zionist Menachem Begin murdered Jews in the King David Hotel: to advance a narrative.

In September 2000, Likud Prime Minister Ariel Sharon led a provocative march to Jerusalem's Temple Mount. When, after a year of calm, suicide bombings recommenced, Sharon and Netanyahu warned that only when Americans "feel our pain" would we appreciate their plight. To feel Israel's pain, they said, would require that America lose 4,500 to 5,000 to terrorism, the initial estimate of those lives lost to a mass murder one year later.

The well-timed operation in Norway turned to mass murder as a means to remake the world order in plain sight. Those complicit specialize in maintaining a storyline that dates from when the medieval Crusades pit Christians against Muslims.

Absent the success of such deceit, we may forget whom to hate.

Jeff Gates is author of Guilt By Association-How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. See www.criminalstate.com

Not Islamic Norway, But Islam in Norway

By Bushra Ishaq
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Courtesy Of "The International News"

In the wake of the terrorism and mass murder in Norway on 22/7 many people have struggled to understand what the incident means. The terrorist justified his acts with a hatred of Islam and condemnation of the Norwegian government for accommodating Muslims. The attacks targeted the very idea which lies at the core of our country’s multicultural society. In his 1,500 page manifesto, Anders Breivik expresses his desire for “genuine Europeans” to defeat multicultural society and to “cleanse” the continent of Muslims. He emphasises the myth of Eurabia – the conspiracy theory of a Muslim takeover of Europe. Few in Norway support these thoughts and Breivik’s ideas are, to a large extent, cut-and-paste adaptations of ideas from right-wing extremists in other parts of Europe.

The conspiracy theory of Eurabia has existed in Europe for quite some time and has become more prominent during the last couple of years. Across Europe, there has been disturbing intolerance towards Muslims and immigrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Inflammatory political rhetoric has increasingly been tolerated by European political media and intellectual elite. And anti-immigrant and anti-Islamic parties are getting stronger – notably in northern European countries which have historically had relatively liberal immigration policies.

The terrorist quotes Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, the Finnish True Finn Party ideologues, and Eurabia authors Bat Ye’or, Mark Steyn and Bruce Bawer. He writes admiringly of the leaders of the English Defence League (EDL) and shares their conviction that Muslims and Islam are basically incompatible with the West, and that Muslims cannot be trusted as fellow citizens because many may be hell bent on imposing shariah and waging jihad.

These accusations are a part of everyday life for many Muslims living in the West. And many people regardless of ethnicity, nationality or political background believe that Muslims will impose their religion on western society. To my great shock, I recently came to know that my statements about educating imams in Norway during a talk about “Islam in Norway” last year were misconstrued and taken to mean that I was advancing the idea of an “Islamic Norway”. I was accused of being involved in a mission to convert Norway into an “Islamic emirate”.

It seems some people in Pakistan as well as in Norway either do not – or do not want to – understand the very conception of liberal-conservative values amongst Muslims. This is in fact the main approach of many young Muslims living in Western societies, including myself. As Western Muslims we seek to contribute to a democratic and secular-liberal mindset in our societies which emphasises the freedom to practice religions like Islam. We hold these to be values which contribute to equal rights and individual freedom. This approach allows every citizen freedom of speech and freedom of religion, both of which are fundamental to our right to practice our religion and to retain our Islamic identity. Therefore, I, among many other Norwegian Muslims, argue for a liberal-secular and pluralistic Norwegian society built on its historical social-democratic values of equality.

And these are the core values of Norway, which the terrorist wanted to attack because Norway has succeeded in the integration of Muslim immigrants and their offspring to a greater extent than many other European countries. Muslims in Norway are by virtue of secular and liberal law provided equal rights to those of any other citizen; right to free education, right to free health care system and the right to practice our religion and build mosques.

Young Norwegian Muslims are by all statistical accounts performing well. We have among the highest employment levels among Muslims in the entire Western world, we enrol in higher education to a larger extent than non-Muslim Norwegians, and there are no ghettos in our cities. Muslim females are growing up as part of a new generation of feminists in Norway, appreciative of living in a society in which higher education, labour market participation and childrearing are all possible for them.

Simultaneously, they regard themselves as practicing Muslims and many females amongst us wear the headscarf as well. Recently, statistics from Statistics Norway (SSB) demonstrated that there are more Muslim females going to the universities in Norway than non-Muslim Norwegian females. As a former president of the Muslim Student Association of Norway, “Muslimsk studenstammfunn,” I was faced with a paradoxical situation in which our board had such total domination of female members that we had to create a special quota for Muslim men in the board elections last year.

As Norwegian Muslims, it is our firm belief that one can and should combine our Islamic identity with much of what is good about the Western mindset and values. For my generation of Muslims – born and raised in Norway, there is no contradiction between being Norwegian and praying five times a day, and in fasting and fulfilling our religious duties alongside being active participants in society at various levels.

Our respected Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre has coined the term “the new Norwegian “we””. He underlines that the Muslims of Norway are an equal part of Norwegian society, and that they are to be regarded as Norwegians. Mr Støre has cautioned against referring to Muslims as “them” and the “Non-Muslim majority” as “us”. He has advanced the view that there should be one common “Norwegian we” that includes all citizens of Norway under the umbrella of one single national identity as Norwegians united by their beliefs in peaceful harmony of different beliefs in our society. That is the Norway I am proud to be a part of. That is the country to which I am committed by virtue of my loyalty and love.

I might not be Norwegian by virtue of descent – but I am a Norwegian by virtue of my commitment to the values of humanity and dignity instilled in me by both, the Norwegian society in which I have been raised and my Islamic faith. And I do hold that the reputation of my country as a tolerant and inclusive society will become even stronger after these heinous terror attacks. For it was the tolerance in Norway which was targeted by the attacks, not the lack of it.

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Multilingualism Is Needed More Than Eve

Iraqi military spokesman Maj. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi, right, sits next to a television display showing captured suspected members of a terrorist group that specialized in carrying out assassinations on security personnel in Baghdad and other provinces, in Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, July 7, 2011.

By Correspondent Dallas Darling
Courtesy Of "The World News Network"


"Much the most important thing about language is its capacity for generating imagined communities, building in effect particular solidarities. After all, imperial languages are still vernaculars, and thus particular vernaculars among many." -Linguist Stephen R. Anderson.

The mass killing of dozens of people in Norway by an anti-immigrant, anti-multicultural extremist is just one of many warnings to nations around the world that not only is multiculturalism and diverse ethnic studies needed to prevent such tragedies, but so too is multilingualism, or the familiarity and acquisition of multiple languages.

But sadly, intolerance, mixed with exclusionary globalization, has shifted patterns of language use. Through certain kinds of mass and electronic medias, backed by military and corporate powers, some languages are increasingly used in international communication while others lose their prominence or completely disappear.

Since language consists of arbitrary symbols and sounds-letters, words, phrases, and sentences-that provide vital interaction with others, including explanations and concepts and ideas about one's environment and the world-the impact of diminishing languages has led to a decrease in creative thought and imagination and inter-cultural communications.

One major concern is the rising significance of English-as used by military and corporate media conglomerates-that is rapidly dominating other languages. Its emphasis on, and repetition of, words and concepts describing violent wars, weapons, consumerist values, and materialistic lifestyles, appears to be having a destructive impact on other cultures.

Western corporative and militarized "vernacular" English is endangering the ecological health of Earth as well.

More societies are internalizing and pursuing the vocabulary and ideas of conspicuous consumption. Violent-like English phrases and concepts have saturated much of the world, homogenizing diverse interactions and cultural perceptions.

For example, violence in !Kung San tribes (Bushmen of Kalahari) were almost unknown until they came into contact with modernization, including the English language and its imperial and colonial overtones. Indigenous tribes around the world have also become more aggressive when introduced to English and its numerous concepts of violence.

At one time, the Semai of Malaya had no explicit word for "kill" and thus, murder was unknown. This changed, though, when they were recruited by the British colonial government to join in the campaign against Communist guerillas in the early 1950's. Introduced to violent words and imagery, they became obsessed with killing.(1)

Acquiring various languages, more peaceful and less violent and imperial ones, are important in socialization. Before the British arrived, Semai parents trained their children in nonviolence. They did this by not striking their children and by substituting the word "hit" for kill. When they did have to "kill" for food, they did it with words of remorse.(2)

Scientific discoveries have shown how words can activate large portions of the human brain, along with emotions.

When words like war, terror, Muslim extremists, killing, murder, illegal aliens, attacks, Islamic terrorists, etc...are repeated every day and over and over again, extensive areas of the brain are activated leading to "brain change."(3)

This brain change partially explains Anders Breivik's shooting rampage and bombing in Norway. He had acquired and internalized extreme far-right vernaculars. Violent and reactionary words and phrases mainly from American right-wing thinkers(4) and Neo-Nazism, Far-right Zionism, Islamaphobia, and Knights Templar, influenced his worldview.

Once these "communal" words are learned and their concepts embedded in neurological endings of the mind, they cannot be erased. In fact, they consciously and subconsciously produce frames of reference, narratives, metaphors, and worldview structures. Accepting such language unthinkingly can make some nations more violent and warlike than others.

Noam Chomsky maintains there is an innate cognitive structure in very young children that pertains to language acquisition. In other words, there is a critical period, a window of time and opportunity, that allows children to quickly learn their native, or other, languages. Would a multi-linguistic environment encourage peace and understanding?

Since words and their meanings govern behaviors and perceptions, learning diverse languages, languages that contain many different views and cultural concepts about the world in which one lives, can lead to not only a greater understanding and awareness of the world, but increasing toleration towards others.

Regarding the globalization and homogenization of the English language, specifically a rapacious corporate and military vernacular propagated through electronic empires, let us hope this critical period-this window of time and opportunity to learn new languages and explore their novel ideas and ways of perceiving the world-has not already passed.

Languages are never neutral, especially when they are militarily or economically imposed onto, and into, others.

The amount of violent words and phrases, including reactionary and highly charged and emotional concepts and frames of reference, can easily transform peaceful and egalitarian societies into war-like and unjust societies.

English vernacular, dominated by corporate and military ultra-conservative tycoons who are at war with much of the world, is extremely violent and war-like. It is the fastest growing language in the world, since it is propagated through global mass medias. It is also monopolizing, and in some cases destroying, more peaceful languages and their ideas.

Anderson warned: "In 500 years time...if English is by then the only language left...it will have been the greatest intellectual disaster that the planet has ever known." Is not multilingualism needed more than ever? And would it not help promote a more peaceful and sustainable world?

Dallas Darling (darling@wn.com)

(Dallas Darling is the author of Politics 501: An A-Z Reading on Conscientious Political Thought and Action, Some Nations Above God: 52 Weekly Reflections On Modern-Day Imperialism, Militarism, And Consumerism in the Context of John's Apocalyptic Vision, and The Other Side Of Christianity: Reflections on Faith, Politics, Spirituality, History, and Peace. He is a correspondent for www.worldnews.com. You can read more of Dallas' writings at www.beverlydarling.com and wn.com//dallasdarling.)

(1) Wilson, Edward O. On Human Nature. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1978., p. 100.
(2) Ibid., p. 100.
(3) Szanto, Andras. What Orwell Didn't Know, Propaganda and the New Face of American Politics. New York, New York: Public Affairs Publishers, 2007., p. 70.
(4) See "Norwegian Shooting Suspect's 'Manifest' Inspired By American Right-Wing Thinkers" by Amy Goodman and Jeff Sharlet, Democracy Now! July 29, 2011, http://www.alternet.org.
(Note: Stephen R. Anderson's quotes are taken from Nicholas Ostler's Empires of the Word: A Language History of the World.)

Friday, August 19, 2011

Europen Leaders Are 'Playing With Fire'

David Cameron
David Cameron leaves the Norwegian embassy after signing the book of condolences for the victims of Norway attacks. Photograph: John Stillwell/AFP/Getty Images


Thorbjørn Jagland Says Europe's Leaders Are 'Playing With Fire' If They Use Right-Wing Rhetoric When Discussing Multiculturalism

By Mark Townsend, 
Home Affairs Editor
Saturday 30 July 2011 18.53 BST
Courtesy Of "The Guardian"


Europe's leaders, including David Cameron, have been warned to adopt a more "cautious" approach when discussing multiculturalism. The Norwegian chairman of the Nobel peace prize committee has told them they risk inflaming far-right and anti-Muslim sentiment.
Thorbjørn Jagland, a former prime minister of his country, said leaders such as the British premier would be "playing with fire" if they continued to use rhetoric that could be exploited by extremists.
Four months ago in Munich, Cameron declared that state multiculturalism had failed in Britain, a view immediately praised by Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP, as "a further huge leap for our ideas into the political mainstream". Marine Le Pen, vice-president of the far-right National Front party in France, also endorsed Cameron's view of multiculturalism, claiming that it corroborated her own party's line.
Jagland's comments come in the wake of the Oslo bomb and the massacre on Utøya Island that left 77 people dead. The killer, Anders Behring Breivik, said he was inspired by the right-wing English Defence League. Breivik sent his manifesto, published online hours before the attacks, to about 250 British members of the BNP, the EDL and the Stop Islamisation of Europe group.
Jagland, who is also secretary general of the Council of Europe, told theObserver: "We have to be very careful how we are discussing these issues, what words are used.
"Political leaders have got to defend the fact that society has become more diverse. We have to defend the reality, otherwise we are going to get into a mess. I think political leaders have to send a clear message to embrace it and benefit from it.
"We should be very cautious now, we should not play with fire. Therefore I think the words we are using are very important because it can lead to much more."
Jagland has also urged leading politicians to change their terminology. He said the word "diversity" was better than multiculturalism because the latter had become defined in different ways by different groups. "We also need to stop using 'Islamic terrorism', which indicates that terrorism is about Islam. We should be saying that terrorism is terrorism and not linked to religion," said Jagland.
Over the years before his attacks, Breivik developed an ultra-radical stance that initially incorporated the forced repatriation of Muslims from Europe, but ultimately targeted Norway's centre-left government, which had encouraged multiculturalism. During his court appearance on terrorism charges, the 32-year-old said he had acted to prevent the "Muslim takeover" of Europe.
It hasemerged that during a 10-hour interrogation, Breivik told police that he also considered attacking other government and Labour party targets in Norway. Police attorney Paal-Fredrik Hjort Kraby revealed that Breivik had again asked interrogators how many people he had killed and "showed no emotion" when they told him.
As Norway struggles to come to terms with the killings, with the first of the dead being buried on Friday, the process of establishing whether Breivik is insane, as his lawyer has asserted, is due to begin. Psychiatrists said the process would involve months of observation, interviews and analysis, insisting that it is hard to fake mental illness. It has also emerged that more than 250 people were picked up by boats from the waters off Utøya Island as Breivik conducted his 90-minute shooting rampage. About 650 people were on the island, of whom at least 68 were killed, most of them teenagers.
During Cameron's Munich speech, which combined a passage on terrorism with one on integration, the prime minister talked extensively about "Islamist extremism" as being the source of terrorism.
Breivik saw David Miliband, Gordon Brown and Tony Blair as worthy of assassination because, according to his 1,500-page manifesto, they had a "friendly attitude" to immigrants.
Jagland says he has sympathy with Cameron's attempt to robustly promote a shared set of British values as an alternative to multiculturalism, if not with his delivery. "We are not searching for a society where we have only different cultures. We also need to have something that holds us together, to respect common values," he said.
Jagland, who last year gave the Nobel peace prize to jailed Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo, who was represented by an empty chair at the ceremony in Oslo, added that the immigration debate also needed to be less negative.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Norway's Mass Murder and The Mass Media

Media Speculation and Guesswork In The Aftermath Of The Norway Attacks; and A One-On-One With Murdoch's Biographer.

Listening Post
Last Modified: 30 Jul 2011 09:45
Courtesy Of "Al-Jazeera"




When news of a bomb blast and shooting first broke in Norway, media organisations the world over were quick to suggest that the people behind the attacks were Islamic terrorists. Even when the facts were hazy, security experts 'analysed', editorials speculated and front pages questioned why Islamic groups would want to attack Norway.


Then, when the perpetrator turned out to be a white, anti–Muslim Christian, news outlets were quick to replace the word terrorist with extremist.

Once the initial coverage calmed down, questions arose: Why were news organisations so quick to assume who was guilty? Is it just a by-product of a 24-hour news cycle? Is there a global news narrative that makes one group guilty until proven innocent? In our News Divide this week, we look at how speculation replaced facts and what the coverage of mass murder says about mass media.

In our News Bytes this week: CNN host Piers Morgan hits back at allegations that he knew about phone tapping when he was the editor of the UK's Daily Mirror; Murdoch publications criticise the media coverage of the phone tapping scandal; journalists in Ecuador are jailed for libel after accusing President Correa of crimes against humanity in a newspaper column; and Online talk show host turned MSNBC anchor, Cenk Uygur leaves the network for political reasons.

As the UK's phone hacking scandal rumbles on, the spotlight remains firmly on the beleaguered News Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch. But few know the media mogul as well as his biographer Michael Wolff. Wolff recorded some 60 hours of interviews, gaining a precious insight into how Murdoch runs his media empire and how editorially involved he gets in the day to day decisions.

Our host, Richard Gizbert caught up with Wolff in New York recently and discussed the similarities between this story and Watergate in the USA, the Guardian UK's role in breaking the story and the Murdoch dynasty's future at News Corp.

Our Internet Video of the Week will make you think twice about news priorities – like we touch on earlier in the show. In the mid 1980's, when East Africa was hit by one of the worst famine's in living memory, the world rallied to support the region. Musicians led the charge, with the famous Live Aid concert in Britain, and the multi-platinum charity single We Are the World in the US.

There were also hours of airtime and reams of news print in the world's media. Fast-forward to today: a famine has just been declared in Somalia but even with an estimated 10 million lives as risk, the story has got little play in the international media. That is a disparity San Francisco-based online cartoonist Mark Fiore has spotted. So he has borrowed the tune from the 1985 hit, updated the lyrics and changed the title to We Are the Whirled. We hope you enjoy the show.

Far-Right Russians Cite Breivik As A 'Hero'

Activists Post Messages On Social Networking Sites Praising Anders Breivik For Killings In Norway.

Last Modified: 31 Jul 2011 19:01
Courtesy Of "Al-Jazeera"



The vast majority of Russians have condemned the killings in Norway by Anders Breivik, but there is an alarming number of people there who quietly share Breivik's opinions and some who even think he is a hero.

Meanwhile, the pro-government youth group Nashi, which was praised by Breivik in his writings, has sought to distance itself from his comments.

Al Jazeera's Neave Barker reports from Moscow.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

The Moral Supporters Of Terrorism

BY MURTAZA HUSSAIN
MONDAY, AUG 8, 2011 15:46 ET
Courtesy Of "Salon Magazine"


While Glenn Greenwald is away this week, Murtaza Hussain will be filing periodic posts
On July 22, 2011 a bombing and shooting massacre was carried out in Norway by an individual motived by fanatic anti-immigrant and Islamophobic beliefs; an atrocity which shocked the world and which could only honestly be described as terrorism. The perpetrator, himself an ethnic Norwegian, hoped to bring about political change through acts of wanton violence against civilians, many of them children and young adults. That this was indeed terrorism is important to note, given that at present Western civilization is purportedly at war with terrorism itself, as well as, crucially, those who provide inspiration and support to terrorists. In this battle those who are even tangentially related to acts of terrorism or purveyors of terror are liable to be incarcerated without due processtortured, and even killed without public outcry. From the perspective of the state, such is the seriousness of terrorism and such are the extraordinary measures which must be taken to prevent terror from being carried out.
In his manifesto, Anders Breivik the perpetrator of the Oslo attacks cited among his inspirations many prominent intellectuals and media figures whose ideas he admired and whose views on topics such as Islam and immigration he strongly identified with. Although many of these individuals have strongly insinuated that perpetrating mass violence in the service of their anti-Muslim agenda is laudable and desirable, it can be reasonably argued that it is unfair to condemn them for actions which, though perpetrated in the name of their ideas, were carried out without their specific consent. Regardless of whether one puts forth odious and potentially dangerous ideologies it can be justifiably said that holding individuals accountable for how others may interpret and act upon their opinions goes against freedom of expression and is potentially deleterious to the marketplace of ideas which should exist in all free societies.
However, what is notable then about the case of Breivik is not so much whom he cited as potentially unwitting inspirations to his act of terrorism, but those who actually leapt to support and justify his actions after it had become undeniably clear that he was in fact a terrorist. While they may distance themselves from the individual, they go out of their way in the wake of his murderous terrorist attack to justify and validate the ideals he killed for.
Here are a few choice quotes regarding the Oslo attack:
  • "I shed no tears for these HAMASnik campers with a Scandinavian dialect. Perpetrators are not victims. Sorry. HAMAS collaborators don’t get my pity. They never will."
  • "Karma is a bitch . . . especially for Jew-haters who were Fatah’s bitch. You hang out with snakes, you get bitten."
  • "Victims” or Perpetrators?" -- Debbie Schlussel, 7/28/11
  • "There was a shooting at a political camp, which sounds a little like the Hitler youth.." -- Glenn Beck, 7/25/11
  • "The more that is revealed about that youth indoctrination center, the more grotesque the whole story becomes"
  • "The jihad-loving media never told us what antisemitic war games they were playing on that island. Utoya Island is a Communist/Socialist campground, and they clearly had a pro-Islamic agenda." -- Pamela Geller, 7/31/11
  • "The youth camp he attacked was engaged in what was essentially a pro-terrorist program." -- Barry Rubin, 7/31/2011
Try to imagine what the reaction to comments such as these would be in the wake of an attack by Islamic extremists. Aside from the vile slander against the victims of a horrifying crime, these words are a clear attempt to justify and legitimize the actions of Breivik. Claiming to oppose violence while simultaneously characterizing the victims of said violence as Nazis and terrorists sends the implicit message that such violence is in fact understandable and laudable. After all, who wouldn’t be inclined to view as permissible violence committed against Nazis and terrorists, and how could one who does commit violence against those parties be said to be unequivocally condemnable? The supreme twisted irony is that those who claim to be appalled by his act of violence while steadfastly defending his motivations very closely mimic the position of Breivik himself who described his actions as being "atrocious but necessary." Violence against "Nazis and terrorists" may not be "nice," but hey, they are "Nazis and terrorists."
In the context of fighting a war against terrorism, and with all the dot-connecting, guilt by-association tactics which that entails, the individuals who inspired and then defended the bigoted motivations of the Oslo terrorist have largely escaped recrimination. Those so open about their sympathies with an ideology which had just given rise to such an atrocity would normally come under harsh, justified scrutiny, not just from the public but perhaps also from law enforcement agencies tasked with preventing the fomentation of further terrorism. By sole virtue of the race and religion of the terrorist in this case those who motivated him have been left unchecked and continue to openly expound the nihilistic ideals which may well inspire the next Anders Breivik.
On her website, Pamela Geller in 2007 shared approvingly an email she received from a source in Norway whom she has kept anonymous. The email reads as follows:
From Israel the hordes clawing at the walls of Jerusalem proclaim cheerfully that next year there will be no more Israel, and I know Israel shrugs this off as do I, and will mount a strike during the summer against all of its enemies in the middle east. This will make the muslims worldwide go into a frenzy, attacking everyone around them.
We are stockpiling and caching weapons, ammunition and equipment. This is going to happen fast.
Before, I thought about emigrating to Britain, Israel, USA, South Africa, etc. for taxes and politics, but instead (although I believe we are the very last generation on earth before the return of God) I will stay and fight for the right to this country and indeed the entire peninsula, for the God-fearing people, just in case this isn't the end of the world after all. Doesn't hurt to have a backup plan.
Individuals engaged in racial and religious demagoguery have succeeded in giving rise to terrorism in the name of their ideals, and in the wake of what their actions have produced they’ve shown no remorse or reticence about continuing to fan the flames of hatred and violence. If those who enthusiastically promote ideologies which inspire terrorism are unwilling to even report or disclose details of planned violence by their followers, the question must be asked as to what level of darkness we must descend before their destructive actions are taken seriously.