By Ibon Villelabeitia and Mussab Al-Khairalla
April 15, 2007
AlertNet
...the bombing of one of Baghdad's most enduring symbols was not only an attack on the city's infrastructure. Some residents and officials fear it could be part of a more sinister plot by insurgents to split Baghdad, with a Shi'ite east bank and a Sunni west bank.
Baghdad, a city of 7 million, has been religiously mixed for most of its history since it was founded some 1,200 years ago on the banks of the Tigris River by Abbasid Caliph al Mansour.
Its dozen bridges linking the east side with the west side were once a symbol of Baghdad's diversity, where Shi'ites, Sunni Arabs, ethnic Kurds and Christians lived together.
But since the bombing of a Shi'ite shrine in Samarra in February 2006, a wave of communal violence has reshaped the city's fabric, carving out sectarian fiefdoms.
Sunnis now mainly live on the west side of the river and Shi'ites on the east.
Some talk gloomily of Baghdad's "bridge wars".
Although the Sarafiya Bridge was built in the 1940s by the British, its destruction prompted eulogies in local newspapers, as if it was a repeat of the shelling of the fabled Mostar bridge, which became a worldwide symbol of Bosnia's 1992-95 civil war.
Saad Eskander, director of Iraq's National Library and a historian, said blowing up Baghdad's bridges has been a military strategy to conquer and defend the city since ancient times.
Medieval rulers burnt Baghdad's bridges, then wooden planks laid over boats roped together, to stop invading Mongols from sacking the city.
The U.S. military, in its wars against Saddam Hussein, destroyed bridges in Baghdad to hinder troop movements.
"Destroying the Sarafiya bridge is an attempt to break Iraq's unity and to polarise our society," Eskander said.
"It is a message that Baghdad will soon become two Baghdads -- one for the Shi'ites and one for the Sunnis."
Monday, April 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment