Monday, February 13, 2012

Bread and Circuses

Orwell or Huxley ?In his book ‘1984’ George Orwell’s vision of the future was of an authoritarian government  that rules by brute force and by restricting the flow of information and  communication. Aldous Huxley, on the other hand, envisaged a society in  his book ‘Brave New World’ where people are distracted into passivity by a constant flow of trivial information and entertainment. So who got it right ? Well personally I think they both did. Kind of.Most  of the time you can clearly see Huxleys vision prevailing in our  society. We float along unthinking in a world of constant, 24/7  distraction and entertainment. Music and movies and the internet and  social-networking and American Idol and celebrity gossip and shopping and advertisements and  all of the shiny gadgets and sound-bytes of disinformation leave very  little time to either think about or question the state of our society.  We’re too busy consuming to revolt.But what if, rarely, a few  people manage to unplug themselves from the distraction for long enough to take a serious look at the way we live ? What if they understand what is  going on and rebel against a society where the majority is exploited  for the benefit of a tiny, privileged minority ? What if they understand the harsh truth that  there’s no hope of fundamental change through the present deeply corrupt political  system and instead challenge the status quo with direct action ? That’s  when it can switch in an instant to Orwells vision of the future. That’s when we see the force of militarized police and a legal system that  works for our rulers. If you ever cease to be a good consumer and  actually look like you’re threatening the  system you can expect to be met with clubs and pepper-spray and dirty  tricks and smears and even jail-time. Orwell said “If you want a  picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face  forever.” Not forever, just when there’s any real challenge to the  status quo. Then you see the ugly face behind the mask.Between them, I think Orwell and  Huxley were scarily accurate in predicting the future but what neither  foresaw was that we would end up with the worst of both worlds. Being  squeezed relentlessly by an iron fist disguised in a velvet glove.Still, what can you do ? I wonder whats on TV tonight ?

"Bread and Circuses" (or bread and games) (from Latin: panem et circenses) is a metaphor for a superficial means of appeasement. It was the basic Roman formula for the well-being of the population, and hence a political strategy unto itself. 

In the case of politics, the phrase is used to describe the creation of public approval, not through exemplary or excellent public service or public policy, but through diversion, distraction, and/or the mere satisfaction of the immediate, shallow requirements of a populace. 

The phrase also implies the erosion or ignorance of civic duty amongst the concerns of the common man (l'homme moyen sensuel).

In modern usage, the phrase has also become an adjective to describe a populace that no longer values civic virtues and the public life. 

Or as famous American author Robert Heinlein said, "Once the monkeys learn they can vote themselves bananas, they'll never climb another tree." 

To many across the political spectrum, left and right, it connotes a supposed triviality and frivolity that characterized the Roman Republic prior to its decline into the autocratic monarchy characteristic of the later Roman Empire's transformation about 44 BCE. [Wikipedia]

No comments:

Post a Comment