From the Occupy movement is already emerging new energy, new commitments, and new conversations. Above, Courtney Hill serves breakfast at Occupy Ottawa in Confederation Park last week.
Photograph by: Chris Mikula, The Ottawa Citizen, Ottawa Citizen
Submitted By "Sayf Maslul"
The Process Is The Point For The Occupy Movement
By Jacqueline Kennelly,
October 31, 2011 3:06 AM
Courtesy Of "The Ottawa Citizen"
Since the Occupy movement arrived in Canada, pundits and media commentators have been scratching their heads, asking the same question in different ways: What is the point? Critics of the nascent movement highlight a lack of coherent goals, the apparent disorganization of those involved, and the pointlessness of camping out to create more equity. Questions are raised as to whether the Occupy movement might do more harm than good, setting up a false and misleading dichotomy of "us" versus "them."
Such questions confine the Occupy movement to categories that are familiar under current social structures. Is it a political party? Well then, it ought to have a platform.
Is it an organization akin to NGOs (like the David Suzuki Foundation, for instance)? Then it ought to have a clear organizational structure. Is it an educational experience for young people? Then it ought to have a focused mandate and an end date.
The reason that public commentators are having such trouble with the Occupy movement is because it defies conventional categories.
"So-cial movement" is the best descriptor that can be applied, but it also looks different than other social movements that Canada has seen over the last decade. This movement is not an exercise in what was derisively described as "summit-hopping" during the height of the anti-globalization movement 10 years ago (although that shorthand description was inaccurate).
Instead, the Occupy movement involves people setting stakes in the ground, both metaphorically and literally, indicating through that act of claiming space that they plan to stay put for the long haul. It involves experiments in direct and radical democracy. In short, it involves trying out things that are neither familiar nor widespread under our current system.
Theorists of democracy have long understood that democracy itself is a process, not an end. Hannah Arendt famously described the public sphere as a shared table, around which we gather in order to relate to one another and find our common ground. This involves much more than going to the ballot box every four years; it requires human relationships, wrought through time spent together struggling over dilemmas and finding solutions to the problems that collectively face us. As the pressure mounts on individuals - not just young people but perhaps felt more keenly by young people - to seek out scarce jobs, pay off mounting debt, and struggle to survive under increasingly unforgiving economic circumstances, the opportunity to come together so as to share frustrations and seek solutions within the public realm is one that is rarely offered. The Occupy movement offers just such an opportunity: a genuine moment of democratic engagement not mediated through the interests of preexisting political parties or NGOs. It represents a chance to experience the actual human relationships that lie at the root of democracy.
From the Occupy movement is already emerging new energy, new commitments, and new conversations. The Occupiers themselves are figuring out how to run their small communities, and more: they're reaching out to others to ex-pand the conversations begun within their tent cities. The Occupy Ottawa movement is engaging with academics at Carleton and the University of Ottawa to develop panel discussions, in order to educate the public and themselves about the complexities of the capitalist system that they know is not working. The original movement in New York, Occupy Wall Street, has had regular visits from scholars and writers. The blogosphere, Facebook, and Twitter are alive with conversations about what this movement means and what it is trying to achieve.
Such questions confine the Occupy movement to categories that are familiar under current social structures. Is it a political party? Well then, it ought to have a platform.
Is it an organization akin to NGOs (like the David Suzuki Foundation, for instance)? Then it ought to have a clear organizational structure. Is it an educational experience for young people? Then it ought to have a focused mandate and an end date.
The reason that public commentators are having such trouble with the Occupy movement is because it defies conventional categories.
"So-cial movement" is the best descriptor that can be applied, but it also looks different than other social movements that Canada has seen over the last decade. This movement is not an exercise in what was derisively described as "summit-hopping" during the height of the anti-globalization movement 10 years ago (although that shorthand description was inaccurate).
Instead, the Occupy movement involves people setting stakes in the ground, both metaphorically and literally, indicating through that act of claiming space that they plan to stay put for the long haul. It involves experiments in direct and radical democracy. In short, it involves trying out things that are neither familiar nor widespread under our current system.
Theorists of democracy have long understood that democracy itself is a process, not an end. Hannah Arendt famously described the public sphere as a shared table, around which we gather in order to relate to one another and find our common ground. This involves much more than going to the ballot box every four years; it requires human relationships, wrought through time spent together struggling over dilemmas and finding solutions to the problems that collectively face us. As the pressure mounts on individuals - not just young people but perhaps felt more keenly by young people - to seek out scarce jobs, pay off mounting debt, and struggle to survive under increasingly unforgiving economic circumstances, the opportunity to come together so as to share frustrations and seek solutions within the public realm is one that is rarely offered. The Occupy movement offers just such an opportunity: a genuine moment of democratic engagement not mediated through the interests of preexisting political parties or NGOs. It represents a chance to experience the actual human relationships that lie at the root of democracy.
From the Occupy movement is already emerging new energy, new commitments, and new conversations. The Occupiers themselves are figuring out how to run their small communities, and more: they're reaching out to others to ex-pand the conversations begun within their tent cities. The Occupy Ottawa movement is engaging with academics at Carleton and the University of Ottawa to develop panel discussions, in order to educate the public and themselves about the complexities of the capitalist system that they know is not working. The original movement in New York, Occupy Wall Street, has had regular visits from scholars and writers. The blogosphere, Facebook, and Twitter are alive with conversations about what this movement means and what it is trying to achieve.
But beyond these conversations lies the more important legacy of a movement such as this one: the embodied experience of lived democracy. It is a recognition that at the root of democracy lie human relationships, in all of their messiness, complexity, and beauty. And it is the realization that the process of building a better world is just that: a process. That is the point.
Jacqueline Kennelly is a professor of sociology at Carleton University. Her most recent book is Citizen Youth: Culture, Activism, and Agency in a Neoliberal Era (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).
We The People Have Found Our Voice Jacqueline Kennelly is a professor of sociology at Carleton University. Her most recent book is Citizen Youth: Culture, Activism, and Agency in a Neoliberal Era (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).
(Occupy Wall Street)
By ivara
We the people have found our voice.
(NYC General Assembly, September 27, 2011)
If it’s our sharing that makes us powerful, why return to normal?
This life is more worth living than the one we left behind.
(Leaflet, Solidarity March with Occupy Wall Street, October 5, 2011)
How do our voices of dissent encounter each other?
Do we really want to merge our raging cacophony into a unified political agenda?
What if the voice of the people is always in a mode of becoming?
Welcome to the hidden track of Occupy Wall Street:
We are discovering new ways in which our desires can resonate together.
This space is our sonogram of potential.
Find the latest news, learn how to participate, and support:
occupywallst.org
Join an occupation, start an occupation:
occupytogether.org
Brought to you by Iva Radivojevic & Martyna Starosta
Useful post. We look forward for the next. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteVery enjoyable post. I like it. Looking for more. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteNice work. I appreciate it. Looking for such useful future works. Thanks.
ReplyDelete