By Noah Shachtman
March 23, 2009 | 2:50:00 PM
Categories: Drones, Perils of Pakistan
Courtesy Of Wired Blog NetWork
The U.S. isn't just launching killer drone attacks on targets in Pakistan, from bases on Pakistani soil. It's doing so without the individual authorization of the Pakistani government.
Before August, the CIA had to ask for Islamabad's OK before launching any attack. The approvals often took "a day or more, sometimes causing the agency to lose track of the target," the L.A. Times reports. But when Pakistani president and Bush administration ally Pervez Musharraf was forced to resign in August, Bush quickly approved "new rules: Rather than requiring Pakistan's permission to order a Predator strike, the agency was allowed to shoot first."
"We had the data all along," a former CIA official tells the paper. "Finally we took off the gloves."
"The effect was immediate, the Times adds. "There were two Predator strikes on Aug. 31, and three more by the end of the week." And dozens more, since then.
The result, American officials say, is an al-Qaeda leadership that's on the run, constantly looking over its shoulder. But Craig Mullaney, rumored to be the next Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Central Asia, wonders whether the drone strikes have been worth it.
"There are advantages to being able to strike remotely, at key leadership in Pakistan," Mullaney recently told Danger Room. "But when you pan back and look strategically: What does that do for the recruiting base of the Taliban in Pakistan, Afghanistan. What does that do for the ability of Al Qaeda to reconstitute? You're balancing the political stability of Pakistan against the military advantages of making these counter-terror strikes. I'm not sure what the answer is."
Over the weekend, new CIA chief Leon Panetta made his first overseas trip -- to South Asia, including Pakistan. The agency won't say exactly what was on his agenda there. But you can imagine.
UPDATE: "The heart of the problem for the West is in western Pakistan," U.S. envoy Richard Holbrooke tells the Christian Science Monitor. "But there are not going to be US or NATO troops on the ground in Pakistan. There is a red line for the government of Pakistan, and one which we must respect." Notice he didn't say anything about robot planes.
[Photo: USAF]
ALSO:
- Obama May Widen Drone War Over Pakistan
- Killer Drones Strike Again in Pakistan
- New Unmanned Attack on Pakistan Kills 14
- Taliban: We Shot Down a U.S. Drone Over Pakistan
- Pakistanis Heart Drone Attacks, Survey Says
- Eight Dead in Latest Killer Drone Strike
- CIA Chief: Drone War Over Pakistan to Continue
- Pak Spies: Drones Destabilizing Qaeda - and Our Gov't
- Drone War Backlash Forces Covert Op Disclosure
- Google Earth Shows U.S. Drones at Pakistani Base?
- Pakistan Partners With U.S. on Killer Drone Strikes
- Drone War Escalates; 30 More Dead in Pakistan
- Pakistan Seethes After Killer Drone Disclosure
- Senator: U.S. Launches Drone War on Pakistan, From Pakistan
- Call Off Drone War, Influential U.S. Adviser Says
- Pakistan to U.S.: Stop the Drone Strikes (And More Weapons, Please)
- Drone War Continues; UAV Production Sky High
- Pakistan's Army Practices Drone Shoot-Downs
- U.S. Sharing Predator Video with Afghanistan, Pakistan
- 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell in Pakistan Drone War
- Robo-Planes New $100 Million Home in Afghanistan
- 10 More Dead as Drone War Over Pakistan Continues
- Pakistan to U.S.: Call Off the Killer Drones
- 20 Killed in Deadly U.S. Drone Strike
- New Twist in Downed Drone Mystery
- U.S. Denies Drone Down - Never Mind the Video
- Report: Pak Forces Fire on U.S. Troops; Drones Kill 50
- Heartbreak and One-Ton Bombs, in Afghanistan
No comments:
Post a Comment