Thursday, December 20, 2007

Who Benefits From The Crime ?

By Robert Thompson
Dec 16, 2007, 08:35
AxisOfLogic

For centuries onlookers and investigators, when faced with a serious crime, have first looked to see who benefits from it.

This should be the case when we examine the assassination of General François El-Hajj in the Baabda quarter of Beirut.

Mr Bush immediately, since he never thinks very hard before opening his mouth, talks of Syrian involvement, and one has to ask who suggested the name of Syria to him.

I consider that it is very easy to answer several questions at the same time.

The only beneficiaries from the death of this leading Lebanese General are the Zionists, who in the past threatened him because he would not join the pro-Zionist militia in the 1980's when they occupied a large area of the Lebanon.

Neither the present puppet "government" of the Lebanon led by Mr Siniora, nor the opposition which includes Hezbollah and General Michel Aoun (and is rumoured to have Syrian support) could in any way benefit from this genuinely patriotic victim's death.

In other words, because they are the only conceivable beneficiaries, Mr Bush's Zionist masters are far and away the most likely perpetrators of this savage killing.

Obviously they wish to blame Syria, a substantial part of whose territory they still occupy in total illegality, since any suggestion which they make will always be accepted by the Bush régime, which is constantly anxious to carry out whatever order the Zionists care to give.

These same comments apply, of course, to the murder of Rafiq Hariri and other prominent personalities in the Lebanon, a country which the Zionists continue to wish to wipe off the map, as is obvious from their invasion and destruction in 2006, and the legacy of dangerous cluster-bombs and other nasty reminders left to harm innocent Lebanese civilians, especially children.

Mr Bush is unable to tell the truth because it involves those who control him and other Republican and Democrat leaders, including Senator Clinton, the wife of his equally corrupt predecessor, who also is most unlikely to apply any serious thought to the question of who ordered these killings.

© Copyright 2007 by AxisofLogic.com

No comments:

Post a Comment